확인사살이네요 살아있는 증인이 있는데 아니라고 하는게 참的繁體中文翻譯

확인사살이네요 살아있는 증인이 있는데 아니라고 하는게 참

확인사살이네요 살아있는 증인이 있는데 아니라고 하는게 참
0/5000
原始語言: -
目標語言: -
結果 (繁體中文) 1: [復制]
復制成功!
這是一個確認殺人事件,有一個活著的證人,但說不,這是真的
正在翻譯中..
結果 (繁體中文) 2:[復制]
復制成功!
Humans are uniquely smart among all the other species on the planet.We are capable of outstanding feats of technology and engineering.Then why are we so prone to making mistakes?And why do we tend to make the same ones time and time again?When Primate Psychologist Laurie Santos from the Comparative Cognition Lab at Yale University posed this question to her team, they were thinking in particular of the errors of judgement which led to the recent collapse of the financial markets.Santos came to two possible answers to this question.Either humans have designed environments which are too complex for us to fully understand, or we are biologically prone to making bad decisions.<br><br>In order to test these theories, the team selected a group of Brown Capuchin monkeys.Monkeys were selected for the test because, as distant relatives of humans, they are intelligent and have the capacity to learn.However, they are not influenced by any of the technological or cultural environments which affect human decision-making.The team wanted to test whether the capuchin monkeys, when put into similar situations as humans, would make the same mistakes.<br><br>[A] Of particular interest to the scientists was whether monkeys would make the same mistakes when making financial decisions.[B] In order to find out, they had to introduce the monkeys to money.[C] The monkeys soon cottoned on, and as well as learning simple exchange techniques, were soon able to distinguish 'bargains' – If one team-member offered two grapes in exchange for a metal disc and another team-member offered one grape, the monkeys chose the two-grape option.[D] Interestingly, when the data about the monkey's purchasing strategies was compared with economist's data on human behaviour, there was a perfect match.<br><br>So, after establishing that the monkey market was operating effectively, the team decided to introduce some problems which humans generally get wrong.One of these issues is risk-taking.Imagine that someone gave you $1000.In addition to this $1000, you can receive either A) an additional $500 or B) someone tosses a coin and if it lands 'heads' you receive an additional $1000, but if it lands 'tails' you receive no more money.Of these options, most people tend to choose option A. They prefer guaranteed earnings, rather than running the risk of receiving nothing.Now imagine a second situation in which you are given $2000.Now, you can choose to either A) lose $500, leaving you with a total of $1500, or B) toss a coin;if it lands 'heads' you lose nothing, but if it lands 'tails' you lose $1000, leaving you with only $1000.Interestingly, when we stand to lose money, we tend to choose the more risky choice, option B. And as we know from the experience of financial investors and gamblers, it is unwise to take risks when we are on a losing streak.<br><br>So would the monkeys make the same basic error of judgement?The team put them to the test by giving them similar options.In the first test, monkey ...
正在翻譯中..
結果 (繁體中文) 3:[復制]
復制成功!
有活生生的證人卻說不是。<br>
正在翻譯中..
 
其它語言
本翻譯工具支援: 世界語, 中文, 丹麥文, 亞塞拜然文, 亞美尼亞文, 伊博文, 俄文, 保加利亞文, 信德文, 偵測語言, 優魯巴文, 克林貢語, 克羅埃西亞文, 冰島文, 加泰羅尼亞文, 加里西亞文, 匈牙利文, 南非柯薩文, 南非祖魯文, 卡納達文, 印尼巽他文, 印尼文, 印度古哈拉地文, 印度文, 吉爾吉斯文, 哈薩克文, 喬治亞文, 土庫曼文, 土耳其文, 塔吉克文, 塞爾維亞文, 夏威夷文, 奇切瓦文, 威爾斯文, 孟加拉文, 宿霧文, 寮文, 尼泊爾文, 巴斯克文, 布爾文, 希伯來文, 希臘文, 帕施圖文, 庫德文, 弗利然文, 德文, 意第緒文, 愛沙尼亞文, 愛爾蘭文, 拉丁文, 拉脫維亞文, 挪威文, 捷克文, 斯洛伐克文, 斯洛維尼亞文, 斯瓦希里文, 旁遮普文, 日文, 歐利亞文 (奧里雅文), 毛利文, 法文, 波士尼亞文, 波斯文, 波蘭文, 泰文, 泰盧固文, 泰米爾文, 海地克里奧文, 烏克蘭文, 烏爾都文, 烏茲別克文, 爪哇文, 瑞典文, 瑟索托文, 白俄羅斯文, 盧安達文, 盧森堡文, 科西嘉文, 立陶宛文, 索馬里文, 紹納文, 維吾爾文, 緬甸文, 繁體中文, 羅馬尼亞文, 義大利文, 芬蘭文, 苗文, 英文, 荷蘭文, 菲律賓文, 葡萄牙文, 蒙古文, 薩摩亞文, 蘇格蘭的蓋爾文, 西班牙文, 豪沙文, 越南文, 錫蘭文, 阿姆哈拉文, 阿拉伯文, 阿爾巴尼亞文, 韃靼文, 韓文, 馬來文, 馬其頓文, 馬拉加斯文, 馬拉地文, 馬拉雅拉姆文, 馬耳他文, 高棉文, 等語言的翻譯.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: